REPUBLIC OF BIAFRA ON THE WAY

Foreign Interference Fueling Ekpa's Destabilization of Nigeria, Reveals CDS

Foreign Interference Fueling Ekpa's Destabilization of Nigeria, Reveals CDS In a shocking revelation, the Chief of Defence Staff, Gen. Christopher Musa, has declared that some countries are actively encouraging Ekpa to destabilize Nigeria. This alarming statement sheds light on the challenges faced by the military in the fight against Simon Ekpa and his men in the Easter part of the country. Gen. Musa expressed his frustration at the lack of progress in the ongoing battle, stating that the military is losing troops daily in the conflict. The toll of this fight on the armed forces cannot be understated, as brave soldiers put their lives on the line to combat the threat posed by Ekpa and his followers. The involvement of external forces in fueling the unrest in Nigeria adds a new layer of complexity to an already volatile situation. It raises questions about the motives behind such support and the potential consequences for the stability of the region. As the military continues to

IPOB's Bold Stand: Rejecting the Continuous Trial of Kanu

In a bold move that has sent shockwaves across the nation, the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has firmly rejected the ongoing trial of their leader, Nnamdi Kanu. This resolute stance has ignited a heated debate, with opinions divided between those who support the trial and those who believe it is an infringement on freedom of speech and expression. In this blog post, we will delve into the reasons behind IPOB's rejection, exploring the implications and potential consequences of this contentious decision. The continuous trial of Nnamdi Kanu has raised concerns among IPOB members and sympathizers, who argue that it is a blatant violation of freedom of expression. They firmly believe that Kanu's arrest and subsequent trial are politically motivated, aimed at suppressing the voice of the Biafran people and stifling their aspirations for self-determination. By rejecting the trial, IPOB is making a powerful statement against what they perceive as an unjust and oppressive sy

RUGA SETTLER COLONIALISM; THE IRISH HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

RUGA SETTLER COLONIALISM; THE IRISH HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE Between 1536 to 1691, the Republic of Ireland was conquered and annexed into the United Kingdom by the King of England as part of the colonies of the English. The Irish were a different Ethnic group completely different from the English in culture, language and ancestry. Even though the Irish and the English had the same religion which was Christianity they belonged to different christian sects. The Irish were Catholics while the English were Protestants. The first thing that was done by the English to make sure that the conquest of Ireland was permanent was to import Settlers from England and Scotland who were majorly Protestants into Ireland. They gave the new settlers one fifth of Irish land. When the Irish people revolted, the English crown responded with force and awarded four-fifth of the land to the Scottish and English settlers. This made many Irish peasants to migrate to America, many became destitute an

Biafran Voices: Global Perspectives on Biafranism

Search This Blog